Search for: "Majors v. Majors"
Results 7541 - 7560
of 55,566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2012, 10:16 am
In the case Fisher v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:25 am
(The case in the Circuit Court is Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 12:22 pm
The cases were DiCarlo v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 2:50 am
Filippone v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:40 am
" _______________ Justice Alito's Majority Opinion in KENTUCKY v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:53 am
., et al. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 8:13 am
The decision came in the case of State v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 10:56 am
Trump v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:39 pm
For in Miller v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm
R. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 5:20 am
And last week, in Connick v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 4:00 am
“Fresh justice is the sweetest”, Sir Francis Bacon, 1618 “..we may look forward to a near future when our courts will be swift and certain agents of Justice”, Dean Roscoe Pound, 1906 “Our system…has come to tolerate excessive delays”, SCC majority in R. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:54 pm
Put that way, the claim would appear to lead to a major expansion of the pat-down authority that the Court first embraced, in significantly more limited form, in a 1968 decision, Terry v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 5:01 am
See generally Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 8:25 am
In NFIB v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:51 am
After Exxon Shipping v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:03 pm
And a Court whose majority is deeply skeptical of affirmative action measures to begin with (see the recent oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 9:14 am
The majority ruled, "Congress authorized, but did not require, the Secretary to extend the permit. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:34 pm
Co. of Sw. v. [read post]
