Search for: "Mark"
Results 7541 - 7560
of 151,845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2022, 3:26 am
Moreover, the owner of the famous mark has successfully canceled several other marks [sic] which use the same suffix. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 1:19 am
In Applicant’s mark, the slogan THE ART OF HEALTHY EATING makes a separate commercial impression from the rest of the mark. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 4:05 am
So, the goods overlap, but what about the marks? [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:54 am
The Board reversed Section 2(d) refusals of the mark THE AUBURN SCHOOL and the logo mark shown below, for special need educational services for children, finding the marks not confusingly similar to the registered marks AUBURN and AUBURN UNIVERSITY for university and community education services. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:57 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark ARKIVE for document and data services, finding the mark to be merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 2:32 am
The USPTO refused registration of the following four marks for "IT consulting services" - MAC SUPPORT AT WORK, MAC SUPPORT AT HOME, BIZMACS, and HOMEMACS [SUPPORT AT WORK disclaimed in the first mark] - finding the marks likely to cause confusion with Apple's registered marks MAC, MAC OS, and MAC.COM for computers and related devices, storage media, software, leasing services, and telecommunication services. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:29 am
The TTAB affirmed this refusal to register the mark MANHATTAN for "upholstered furniture," finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark MANHATTAN CABINETRY for "custom designed and crafted furniture" [CABINETRY disclaimed]. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:38 am
Patricia Dampier to use the mark MRS. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 8:08 am
" The marks are also similar in sight and sound. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 10:32 am
The Ninth Circuit has held (wrongly, in my opinion) that the defendant’s mark need not be identical, nearly identical, or even substantially similar to the plaintiff’s mark under the TDRA. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:03 am
But are the marks confusingly similar? [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 4:56 am
Alternatively, consumers could perceive the mark as a general slogan for Dr. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:54 am
It then sustained opposer's claim of likelihood of confusion between the two marks shown below: the applied-for mark on the left, for "restaurant franchising," and opposer's common law mark on the right, for restaurant services and consulting service for new restaurant owners. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 2:59 am
Applicant's mark could be seen as a variation of the VELENO mark or as identifying a new venture by the source of VELENO guitars. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 4:03 am
Tasty Greens LLC opposed an application to register the mark ONE GREEN for nutritional supplements, claiming a likelihood of confusion with its registered mark 8GREENS, also for nutritional supplements. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 4:32 am
” But there was no evidence as to how the registered mark is used. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 2:26 am
BY ALDO is likely to be considered a tag line or house mark. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 2:54 am
" The Board also pointed out that, because the cited mark is in standard character form, the registrant could display its mark in the same font style as applicant's mark. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 2:47 am
However, there was no evidence of commercial weakness of the cited mark. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:58 am
The Board cancelled registrations for the marks REGISTERED E-MAIL and (R)EGISTERED E-MAIL for electronic message delivery services "equivalent to registered mail," finding the marks likely to cause confusion with the common law mark REGISTERED MAIL, owned by the U.S. [read post]
