Search for: "Matter of Robert T"
Results 7541 - 7560
of 10,572
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2011, 4:36 pm
.'" Beyond cost, there is the matter of ensuring firefighter health and safety, he adds. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 2:16 pm
They can’t just order them up for just-in-time delivery, like a Tiffany watch. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm
Bockting, on retroactivity), Justice Scalia didn’t write. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:52 pm
After Robert McBride was injured at work, he sued his employer, CSX, arguing that the railroad had been negligent, or careless. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:47 pm
For the majority, it did not matter that the speech involved is “commercial” speech – instead of, for example, speech by an individual about politics – even though the Court in other cases has said that the government can impose more regulations on speech about commercial matters because it receives less protection under the First Amendment. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:16 pm
It wasn’t always true. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:49 am
You can go back and read it, or I can give you the short version, which is this: In Crawford, Scalia explained that only thing that mattered in determining whether admission of an out-of-court statement violated the Confrontation Clause was whether it was testimonial; whether it was reliable wasn’t relevant. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:50 am
like that delivered in Justice Roberts' majority opinion? [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:15 pm
You can’t defend a position effectively if you don’t deal with obvious objections. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:04 pm
"Don't lawyers know anything about incentives or efficiency? [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
Somebody died and we don't know why. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:24 am
And even if the history didn't bear this out (or didn't matter), the majority's logic still doesn't follow. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
(quoting Roberts v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:17 pm
And then they remembered: there’s that matter of collecting taxes on cigarettes. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
United States: In an opinion written by Justice Alito, joined by Justices Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Kagan, the Court upheld a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule for searches conducted in violation of a defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:39 am
Wells, which was joined by Justices Sotomayor and Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:30 am
In the video tribute leading up to Bob Schmitt’s award, a friend said, “Bob simply won’t say no to any request, no matter how demanding, as long as it helps someone. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:07 am
Roberts? [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Alito seemed remiss to do this in McDonald with respect to the privileges or immunities clause. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:03 pm
But because judge pro tems are used infrequently and “sporadically,” the Committee seems to sing,“Don’t Worry Be Happy. [read post]
