Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 7541 - 7560 of 13,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ Nos. 21A244 and 21A247 _________________ NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, ET AL., APPLICANTS 21A244 v.DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, ET AL. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:38 pm by Marty Lederman
’” Then, relying upon the Supreme Court’s brand-new decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 11:41 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The most recent decision of this type was last Monday, United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
But Linroy Bottoson nonetheless stands for something exceedingly important about the death penalty in the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
In a rare, contested concurrent use proceeding, the Board awarded junior user ABF concurrent use registrations for the three marks shown below, for hotel and motel services, in the entire United States except for the State of Arizona. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:59 pm by cdw
From the intro: Leading off this week are two stays from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:43 am
Perhaps the most significant criminal case in our collection was United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 10:46 am by Mark Latham
ShareOn Wednesday, the justices will hear argument in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 6:01 am by Maya Angenot
As stated by the majority, the outcome hinged squarely on whether Westboro’s speech was of public or private concern, as public speech in the United States is granted almost untouchable protection. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Their question concerns the standard of proof required by section 282 of 35 USC (the Patent Act section of the United States Code) which states that: "[a] patent shall be presumed valid" and that "[t]he burden of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim thereof shall rest on the party asserting such invalidity. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
” On this blog, Kevin Russell writes about the Court’s call for the views of the Solicitor General in two ERISA petitions arising from the case Amara v. [read post]