Search for: "STATE v. SMALL"
Results 7541 - 7560
of 16,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2016, 6:16 am
In Davis v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 7:43 pm
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:37 am
” The Court further stated that Article III requires only a case or controversy, and the case does not become moot so long as the parties have a concrete interest, however small, in the litigation. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
United States, 529 U.S. 848, 857 (2000) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:48 am
See Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
At the arguments in the case, Friedrichs v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Sullivan, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Sunday, January 17, 2016 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Derivatives, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Leverage,Mutual funds, No-action letters, Private funds, Risk, Risk management, Rule 18f-4, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities Regulation, Swaps PECO v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:14 am
The government characterizes it as a factual question—one that (a) the military commission should answer in the first instance (which is why it argues for Councilman abstention), and (b) that can and should be made now in retrospect about the state of affairs in 2000. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:23 am
The Supreme Court of the United States yesterday announced its decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:46 am
(Unocal Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:54 am
Additional Resources: The House Always Wins, January 5, 2016, Watchdog.Org, By Larry Benson More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Part I of this paper analyzes the ways that researchers, particularly in the United States, have attempted to define and identify cases of wrongful conviction. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 10:04 pm
United States v. 39 Cases, 192 F. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 2:37 pm
This matches the small purchase threshold identified in the Common Grant Rule. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 1:42 pm
Likely there to hear arguments in Nebraska v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
Plaintiff Robert Stephenson, a Virginia resident, is a former employee of defendant Alliance Consulting Group International, LLC (`Alliance’), a small consulting company that performs classified work for the Department of Defense. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 4:20 pm
The Supreme Court ruled in 2003’s Dastar v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 9:21 am
Cash & Henderson Drugs, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 7:46 pm
Last month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Samsung's petition for an injunction rehearing relating to the second Apple v. [read post]
