Search for: "Sides v. Beene" Results 7541 - 7560 of 25,503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2018, 1:02 pm by emagraken
While undoubtedly not embraced by either side, it cannot be said that the award for non-pecuniary damages of $24,000 would not meet the test in Nance v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 8:34 am
Questions in the Tom Kabinet CJEU reference finalized (at last) | Court of Appeal, following EPO, reverses Carr J in Regeneron v Kymab dispute | Regeneron v Kymab - Part I: Sufficiency | How do you protect patents from judicial and expert hindsight? [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Report and Recommendation issued almost a year after oral argument on cross-motions for summary judgment, concludes that Odyssey Education Resources LLC was properly appointed as a Servicer, and should be paid its invoices. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:17 pm by Robert Chesney
  Meanwhile, here’s my most recent previous post on the transfer issue in Doe v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:00 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer, Ashley Deeks
” More directly, the Strategy lays out principles for retention of CCTV images: “It has long been accepted that CCTV recordings should routinely be kept between 28 and 31 days before recording over. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:15 am by Scott McKeown
In other circumstances, the Board has exercised its discretion to deny petitions stuffed with unexplained and numerous grounds Zetec v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
An early round win, such as defeating the adverse party’s bid for a preliminary injunction, is no guaranty the other side won’t prevail, with or without an assist from a panel of appellate judges. [read post]
4 May 2018, 10:00 am by Christopher Schmidt
I had a finished dissertation on “Postwar Liberalism and the Origins of Brown v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 8:58 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
” So far, the Reds have not been able to sway legal opinion to their side. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Erwin, drawing on one episode that arose when he was a faculty member at the University of Southern California and a more recent one in the short time he has been at Berkeley, felt it was a dean’s job to speak out and condemn prominent expressions of bigotry and intolerance that take place at a law school in a way that makes them highly visible to the community, even though those expressions in many cases might have been perfectly constitutionally protected (and thus immune… [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:10 am by Dave
  In this decision, by different routes, the Court of Appeal has held that the House of Lords decision in R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Ferdous Begum [1993] AC 509 remains good law, thus effectively putting to one side the significant developments in what I would call the governmentality of persons without capacity. [read post]