Search for: "State v. Chance"
Results 7541 - 7560
of 12,119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2012, 4:17 am
In Riegel v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:44 am
The legal presumption in favour of life: Mr Justice Peter Jackson in A Local Authority v E [2012] (Infra) at para. 120 states: “All human life is of value and our law contains the strong presumption that all steps will be taken to preserve it, unless the circumstances are exceptional. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:43 am
XX v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 742 (15 June 2012). [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm
One or more words that might reasonably be required by a competitor to describe similar goods/service cannot be such a badge.I'm going to be lazy here and simply paste in the relevant section of Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks [(1964) 111 CLR 51, in which Kitto J said:"In Registrar of Trade Marks v W. and G. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 5:07 am
” As in: United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 4:20 pm
In Yearwood v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:30 am
Tex. 1990), aff'd sub. nom., U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:21 am
" Martin Oliver v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:23 am
Thirty years ago this week, the high court ruled in Plyler v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:32 am
(Winter v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:57 am
On Wednesday the government filed a supplemental brief in Kiobel v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 4:17 pm
While we expect individuals to respect the rights of intellectual property owners, we should also expect the state, agents or those acting in the interest of the state, to do the same. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:47 pm
Eli Lilly & Co. and Jirak v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 9:05 am
It was in Nickell v Matlock that Nickell was selling only half of a parcel to defendant Matlock. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:36 am
United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:05 pm
” The filing did accept (and noted that the State Department, too, had accepted) that a right to sue had been properly recognized by the Second Circuit Court in 1980, in the case of Filartiga v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
Rogers case (DUVAL MOTORS CO. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
In contrast to the United States, treble (or multiple) damages are not available. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:53 am
In the two years prior to the Federal Circuit's grant of en banc review of inequitable conduct in Therasense v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Fortunato v. [read post]
