Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 7541 - 7560
of 9,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2011, 8:42 am
Obama (10-487) — raised an immediate question of whether the Court will take on any of several disputes over the judicial procedures being used in lower federal courts to implement the Justices’ 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 7:28 am
The district court in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
When lawyers talk about the proper "venue" of a case, they mean the location where it will be heard, i.e., which county if the case is in state court, or which federal district if the case is in federal court. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
In a sense, that’s not terribly surprising, since Judge David Hamilton had previously taken the same track (if less explicitly) in his previous opinion while still on a district court judge in Hofts v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:41 pm
The dissent also agreed that the case involved issues of first impression, but concluded that under Luidens v. 63rd District Court, 219 Mich. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:19 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:13 pm
Both state and federal courts give certain appellate cases priority. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:07 am
Varnum When the Iowa Supreme Court decided the Varnum v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:08 pm
Defendant appealed to the First Judicial District Court. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm
State ex rel. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
Johns, but the Court of Appeals reversed in Grossman v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:12 am
* * * Fourth Circuit: "[T]o survive a motion to dismiss, the complaint must 'state[ ] a plausible claim for relief' that 'permit[s] the court to infer more than the mere possibility of misconduct' based upon 'its judicial experience and common sense.' Ashcroft v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:04 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Morrison v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 11:53 am
The District Court dismissed Jacobs’ complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
State, 2 So. 3d 137 (Fla. 2009), mandating a cut-off IQ score of 70 or below to meet the first prong of the test for mental retardation in capital sentencing, is contrary to Atkins v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
The trial court granted appellees' motion, finding first that the agreement violated Rule 4-5.6 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:49 pm
The Court likely will announce a decision by the morning of January 10 unless it decides to hold over the case.The Comer v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:09 pm
We've already written a post on one of the first, Meharg v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition Title: Herrera v. [read post]
