Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 7541 - 7560
of 9,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2010, 7:43 pm
In another case this week, AT&T v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:42 pm
At the most basic level, the lawsuit is a federal challenge to a state marriage ban. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
At the argument, the Justices focused on the level of scrutiny that should be used to review such a requirement, as well as on the kind of remedy that Flores-Villar could obtain. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
(Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps AOL – Patent reexamination games not tolerated in Texas court: Beneficial Innovations v AOL (Patents Post Grant Blog) Apple – ALJ Bullock issues orders on evidentiary motions in Certain Mobile Communications and Computer Devices (337-TA-704) involving Apple and Nokia (ITC Law Blog) Apple – ALJ Gildea denies Apple’s motion to compel in Certain Electronic Devices (337-TA-701) (ITC Law… [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm
I understand that the parties will hear shortly whether the Times’ application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court will be granted. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:36 am
In County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:01 am
Riddell, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:15 am
It might be asked why a case which could readily be decided in this court using the procedures now available should not be heard here. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:21 pm
The court concluded that if the injunction was granted, the public would lose the immediate benefits of the reforestation efforts. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 12:59 pm
Thanks to Dan Cummins' "Tort Talk" blog, we just learned of another case: McMillen v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:37 am
It was used by Judge Posner in the Seventh Circuit to grant an injunction blocking a copycat class action in another jurisdiction. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 6:19 am
International Dairy Foods Association v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:36 pm
Shapo, Constitutional Tort: Monroe v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm
V. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:47 am
Supreme Court ruling, in the landmark case of Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
Even the most controversial Supreme Court decision in recent memory, the Bush v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:29 am
See Moltner v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
Ehlinger v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 9:55 pm
Such statements can then be used to support the making of a consent order. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:55 pm
Damien Echols v. [read post]
