Search for: "United States v. Good" Results 7541 - 7560 of 21,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2019, 5:57 am by Emmah Wabuke
In the 1990s, the body added “promotion of democracy and good governance” to its objectives. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629, is a revival, having been to the Court once before. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:33 pm by Pamela Wolf
In United States v Windsor (Dkt No 12-307), the petitioner contends that DOMA has denied gays and lesbians who have been allowed to marry lawfully in certain states all of the benefits and protections that married couples enjoy under federal law. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Although as was true with cases like United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:54 am by Mark Graber
  If given a choice between capital punishment as practiced in the United States and no capital punishment, the queasy moderates might choose no capital punishment. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 10:38 am
He said immigrants come to the United States to work, often trying to stay under the radar of authorities and away from criminal activity to avoid deportation. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm by Afro-Buff
 Elsewhere, in the United Kingdom, for instance, a period of five years is and was relevant. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:23 am
As she explains, there are good reasons to think the answer should be no---that the rationales for permitting undercover informants and consent searches don't mix.I want to add that the underlying constitutional law (per United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:10 am by Walter James
  In July 2011, according to the government, the United States Coast Guard conducted a Port State Controlexamination on the Fishing Vessel (F/V) San Nikunau, when the vessel entered port in Pago Pago, American Samoa. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:56 am by Larry
The Court therefore, entered judgment in favor of the United States and dismissed the case.By Lawrence M. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Wade will be repealed (with abortion still possibly legal on a state-by-state basis) but whether the Court would invent a doctrine under which abortion would be constitutionally prohibited nationwide.Beyond abortion, I asked whether even Griswold v. [read post]
  Moreover, in Burke v United Kingdom (App No.19807/0) 11 July 2006, the argument that there was insufficient protection of art 2 rights because a doctor might decide to withdraw CANH without being under an obligation to obtain the approval of the court was expressly rejected. [read post]
Ga.)); Bring a complaint in California federal court along with Attorneys General from six states (claims made by five states based on pendent jurisdiction dismissed in FTC v. v. [read post]