Search for: "*u.s. v. Govern"
Results 7561 - 7580
of 41,780
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
In Muransky v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:44 am
”[8] The Louisiana expense attribution provisions outlined above are based on federal tax provisions aimed at preventing United States taxpayers from claiming deductions for amounts incurred to generate income not included in federal taxable income by the United States.[9] There are two Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) provisions on which the Louisiana law is based: Section 265, which addresses the treatment of interest expense incurred to generate income that is… [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Mgmt., 2020 U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:50 pm
Gorsuch echoed Sotomayor’s point later on, in a question for Christopher Michel, the assistant to the U.S. solicitor general who argued on behalf of the federal government as a “friend of the court” supporting Louisiana. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:21 pm
Snyder v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
The U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 7:16 am
In Carpenter v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In McNally v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Flood and Cline said the chief judge for the U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
Powell on the U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 2:46 pm
Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 1:34 pm
Both the district court and the U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:05 pm
Monday’s argument in Van Buren v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:35 am
” The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this morning in Nestlé USA v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:45 am
Whether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 8:12 am
(See U.S. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 8:12 am
(See U.S. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 7:19 am
The U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 6:14 am
Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
