Search for: "Branch v. State" Results 7561 - 7580 of 8,128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2008, 9:28 pm
Blue, New York State Supreme Court Criminal Branch Law Library, First Judicial District, New York, NY [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:11 am
Actually it was for a piece I was putting together for Supreme Court Preview, an excellent ABA publication that provides a sneak peek at upcoming high court decisions.The case I was turning my attention to -- Winter v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
Here, for example, is a link to the Texas site.Eventually, you'll find this interview with Judge John Nangle, then Chair of the MDL Panel, that appeared in The Third Branch in 1995. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 3:43 am
The S.G. is still relying heavily on Wilkerson v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 5:23 pm
When the Supreme Court struck down the death penalty for raping an adult, in the 1977 decision in Coker v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 7:31 am
In the United States, judges have been less attached to such grand garb. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:34 pm
  They relied heavily on a 2006 decision by the state's highest court,  Hernandez v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]