Search for: "Caming v. United States"
Results 7561 - 7580
of 9,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
In case you're wondering why this topic has been chosen, it has been quite controversial in the United States and, in a recent judgment in Och-Ziff, Mr Justice Arnold considered that it was actually part of both EU and United Kingdom trade mark law. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm
Varsity Brands to patent review in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
The Court of Justice by its judgment dated 15 September 2011 gave its response: British Airways plc v Williams (Case C-155/10) [2012] ICR 847. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
The history of the case to date 6- When the appeal first came before the Supreme Court, British Airways' primary submission was that the United Kingdom legislator, by omitting to introduce any detailed scheme for the calculation of "paid annual leave" like that provided under the Working Time Regulations, must be taken to have left this to be determined by collective or individual agreement between the parties, whatever might be the effect of the Aviation Directive. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
The Court of Justice by its judgment dated 15 September 2011 gave its response: British Airways plc v Williams (Case C-155/10) [2012] ICR 847. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 6:57 am
See Cathedral Hill Tower v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
Rudnick v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:59 am
Only Lundbeck still manufactures the drug for purchase in the United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
I think it does become part of the political -- you would then have the Citizens United decision, the Bush v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Still, the cancellations forfeit cheaper prices that came from booking early, and better budgeting could have covered both. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:50 pm
The first case, Biden v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 9:53 am
Now, a Second Circuit opinion in Kilgour v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 3:56 am
See also Hearst Corp. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:30 am
., a wayback machine entry dated before the critical date, the same evidence is - at this point - unlikely to be admissible in court due to hearsay issues.AFAIK, the wayback machine has overcome hearsay objections in only one case (Telewizja Polska United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
So much so that it has become one of the largest sources of debt in the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 12:34 pm
The big case was Snyder v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 3:02 pm
The Republicans could demand, say, a constitutional amendment overruling Roe v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:29 pm
Instead, they came about as a consequence of FDA’s decisions following a 1999 federal appeals court ruling (Pearson v. [read post]
