Search for: "City of New York v. State of New York" Results 7561 - 7580 of 10,060
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2011, 4:22 am
If he was so lawfully dismissed, any pension benefits to which he would otherwise be entitled would be forfeited pursuant to Section 13-173.1 of the New York City Administrative Code. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:02 am
The proposed charter agreement was submitted to the New York State Board of Regents, which approved and issued it in January 2006. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 12:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
  This Week at the PLUS D&O Symposium: Weather permitting, this week I will be attending the 2011 PLUS D&O Symposium in New York City. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 12:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
  This Week at the PLUS D&O Symposium: Weather permitting, this week I will be attending the 2011 PLUS D&O Symposium in New York City. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
”The court also called attention to the Rules of City of New York Police Department (38 RCNY) §15-03 which, in pertinent part, required that "[s]ervice of the Charges and Specifications shall be made in a manner reasonably calculated to achieve actual notice to the respondent" and that "[a]ppropriate proof of service shall be required. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 8:33 am by John Hochfelder
City of New York (1st Dept. 2003) - $5,000,000 ($2,500,000 past - 6 years, $2,500,000 future - 30 years); 43 year old; brain damage with progressive tissue loss in lobes Paek v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
   I was born back in Brooklyn, New York, I mostly grew up in Pittsburgh, and my wife’s from the City of Chicago… and I’m here to tell you that if someone tried to pull something like that on someone else in any of those places back when we were kids, the offending party would pray for the dispute to be settled in a courtroom, you know what I’m saying here? [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:49 am by mjpetro
New York, 392 U.S. 40, 61 (1968) ("The question in this Court upon review of a state-approved search or seizure is not whether the search (or seizure) was authorized by state law. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  After respondent repeatedly failed to make payments required under the agreement, the federal court modified its order and imposed various restrictions on respondent, inter alia, limiting his business and personal expenditures and generally confining his personal travel to the City of New York and his business travel to New York State and New Jersey (Baker v Dorfman, 2006 WL 988756)[SD NY 2006]. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:48 am
”A similar issue was considered by New York State's Court of Appeals in Longwood Cent. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 7:30 am
Extending the probationary periodSubway-Surface Supervisors Assn. v New York City Tr. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:26 am
I. v New York City Bd. of Educ., 256 AD2d 189; McDonald v Cook, 252 AD2d 302; and Lemp v Lewis, 226 AD2d 907, in support of its ruling. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sillman v Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 3 NY2d 395 (1957); Grullon v City of New York, 297 AD2d 261 (1st Dept 2002). [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 1:06 am by John Hochfelder
City of New York (1st Dept. 2011), the appellate court has ruled that $800,000 is excessive and that there should be a reduction to $400,000. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:43 am
A State Supreme Court justice dismissed complaint, ruling that the department’s policy was proper and does not violate Article V, Section of the New York Constitution or Section 61.2 of the Civil Service Law. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:06 pm by Ilya Somin
City of New London, post-Kelo eminent domain reform, and recent judicial decisions on takings, especially the two big New York Court of Appeals decisions (the Atlantic Yards and Columbia cases).VC readers are more than welcome to come to either or both events! [read post]