Search for: "Does 1 - 20" Results 7561 - 7580 of 28,828
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2020, 7:50 pm by Shea Denning
The installment plan set up fee of $20 under G.S. 7A-304(f) may not be assessed until after the due date has passed. [read post]
4 May 2020, 9:41 am by Bianca Saad
The ordinance does not contain a specific provision addressing how to calculate the rate of pay. [read post]
4 May 2020, 9:33 am by William Ford, Elliot Setzer
The ICAP Staff Attorney 1 will be supervised by ICAP's Executive Director and Legal Director. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:12 am by Griffen Thorne
CCPA took effect on January 1, 2020, a few years after the law was actually passed. [read post]
3 May 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
He could be sentenced to as much as 20 years in prison and $250 in fines on each count up to $1 million. [read post]
3 May 2020, 10:48 am by Giles Peaker
The FTT does not decide any issues relating to rights of access. [read post]
1 May 2020, 6:09 pm by Dan Flynn
If convicted on all charges, Kruse could be sentenced to as much as 20 years on each count and fines totaling $1 million. [read post]
1 May 2020, 1:56 pm by Abacus IP
But calculating the exact date must be pieced together from a number of sources: 1. [read post]
1 May 2020, 1:56 pm by Abacus IP
But calculating the exact date must be pieced together from a number of sources: 1. [read post]
1 May 2020, 1:32 pm by CharlesB
The sobering fact for 20-year-olds is that more than 1-in-4 of them becomes disabled before reaching retirement age. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:04 am
On August 20, 1866, delegates from over 50 craft unions formed the National Labor Union. [read post]
1 May 2020, 6:26 am by China Law Blog
Just because a supplier is FDA-registered does not mean their product quality is good. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]