Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7561 - 7580
of 11,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
[1]Alfred C Toepfer Inc v Edokpolor (1965) NCLR 89. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
Essentially Craig v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:42 am
This week’s much-anticipated decision by the First Circuit in Mehanna v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:04 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Morrison v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 6:25 am
Today's Hindu carries an op-ed by Vishnu V. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 6:24 pm
This post follows up yesterday's about questions asked by the Supreme Court Justices during oral argument in the Hall v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 8:08 pm
In Hunter et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:31 pm
Koontz v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:09 pm
She is of Somali origin and has a poor understanding of English. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:08 am
(Oh, and if you're wondering what the photo is, it's of a historic English Chancery Court.) [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 9:05 pm
YouTube11filed: May 4, 2007This class action suit for copyright infringement was filed by English Premier League, a major professional sports league from the U.K. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:44 pm
(Eugene Volokh) That seems to be what happened in Alkhafaji v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Co. for Life & Health Ins. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:17 pm
by Dennis Crouch Peter v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:55 am
The court may declare ineligible to act as fiduciary a person unable to read and write the English language. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 12:18 pm
The UK Legal Approach The starting point for construing contracts of all kinds under English law is well settled and was succinctly expressed by Lord Neuberger in Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36; [2015] AC 1619, at paragraph 15 where he said: “When interpreting a written contract, the court is concerned to identify the intention of the parties by reference to “what a reasonable person having all the background knowledge which would have been available to… [read post]
13 May 2012, 8:20 am
Because Allergan relied, amongst others, on the earlier national UK trade mark registrations for BOTOX, the General Court, when assessing BOTOX's reputation, examined the volume of sales of the products marketed under BOTOX, the promotion of that mark in articles published in English scientific journals, the media coverage, particularly in the English press, the inclusion of the word BOTOX in English language dictionaries and decisions of the UK… [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:46 am
The “Angry Mob” goes on to point out that English Defence League had picked up the story and used it as evidence “that foreigners (read: Muslims) were forcing more British culture to be abandoned“. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:43 am
From the Blogs The first instance decision in that case is discussed on the UK Human Rights Blog which suggests that the case reignites debate on the place of religion in the English courts. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 10:44 pm
Washington's request must have struck him as reasonable enough, since English sovereigns regularly sought advice from their courts. [read post]
