Search for: "FIRST ACCEPTANCE INSURANCE COMPANY"
Results 7561 - 7580
of 7,657
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2007, 2:33 am
My first summer there I attended numerous health care insurance appeals - trying to convince the most wealthy insurance companies to cover cancer treatment for folks, who were denied coverage becuase they had "pre-existing conditions. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 5:26 am
[One generates obscene profits for medical providers and the other obscene profits for insurance companies.] [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 6:27 am
To decide which parent holds the primary plan, health insurance companies commonly use the birthday rule. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
The rule has gained extraordinarily wide acceptance - we previously listed precedent for the rule in 47 states and two other American jurisdictions. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 1:21 pm
(See also: Child Support; IV-D; IV-D Case; IV-A Case; IV-E Case) Case Initiation First step in the child support enforcement process. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 7:27 pm
The Commissioner rejected the first argument but accepted the second argument. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 9:09 am
If Henry doesn't deliver the film, Juan is not obligated to pay for it, and the bank is not repaid its loan.To avoid this risk, the bank wants a completion guarantor, a type of insurance company, to agree to put up any money needed to complete the film should it go over budget. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 4:04 am
In April 2006, we completed a first draft of the patent billing code and draft trademark billing code sets. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 10:38 am
Read literally, it sounds like ABSFA does a lot more than insure that "sales" won't be recharacterized as "secured loans. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 5:48 am
First, the court agreed with plaintiffs that the predominance test had been satisfied, holding that the common issues will be a “significant part” of the litigation. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 12:25 pm
As the Court noted, acceptance of Safeco's argument that first-time customers are excluded from the notice obligation would open a gaping loophole in the law by eliminating notice in the circumstance where it is most likely to be needed. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 10:19 am
Another question about health insurance: Would you accept a single-payer plan? [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 3:59 pm
Justice Stevens noted that insurers were free to set their own "neutral" rates, and would probably set these rates low, resulting in very little notification for first-time consumers. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 2:25 pm
The person with the debts is called the debtor and the people or companies to whom the debtor owes money are called creditors. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 1:07 am
If not, tell me how the first part can be true but not the second. [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:57 pm
(By the way, the notion that these two companies have any market power seems ridiculous to me.) [read post]
29 May 2007, 6:07 pm
Revenue I recommend that the Secretary of State initially impose a nominal filing fee for accepting the filings necessary for establishing an online company. [read post]
25 May 2007, 12:55 am
But unlike some of his competitors, he believes he's managed to cap them at an acceptable level. [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:57 pm
" Tosoh's claim to be the only company to have such specifications and tolerances necessarily implied that Applied didn't have them; Applied's complaint stressed that precise dimensions and tolerances are crucial to producing acceptable component parts. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
They're not as powerful as straight preemption, but in some situations they might have more appeal.The first of these is what we call judicial deference. [read post]
