Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 7561 - 7580 of 37,553
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2019, 7:05 pm
  The CPE WGE has suggested that the White Paper, along with Chinese positions on its Belt and Road Initiative, suggested the outlines of an all around strategy first to marginalize, then to encircle, and then to make less relevant, the United States, at least as driving force for global trade and production (CPE Working Group on Empire: U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:02 am by Laura Sandwell
Barnes (as former Court Appointed Receiver) v The Eastenders Group & Anor, heard 24 – 25 February 2014. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:23 am by Doug Cornelius
But the sheer number of candidates and political groups he targeted would violate the aggregate limits. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:44 am by Biersdorf & Associates
Dan Biersdorf is representing the property owner in Dakota County v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 1:23 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Environmental groups eventually brought suit in state court to require the county to enforce the ordinance. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by Randy Marse, Jr.
”[7] Defendants and several intervening energy industry groups filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by Liskow & Lewis
”[7] Defendants and several intervening energy industry groups filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by Randy Marse, Jr.
”[7] Defendants and several intervening energy industry groups filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. [read post]