Search for: "Grant v. State" Results 7561 - 7580 of 68,540
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Therefore, he would have granted certiorari for the case but would not have granted a stay. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  Where a state breaches the ECHR, a Court set up by signatory members – the European Court of Human Rights (which has nothing to do with the European Union) – can order a state to pay an aggrieved citizen compensation. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm by Eugene Volokh
Maryland, 442 U.S. 735, 742-743 (1979) (telephone call logs conveyed to telephone company); United States v. [read post]
Complaint Counsel moved for partial summary decision on the threshold legal issue, and the presiding officer granted the motion by order on January 19, 2022. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:29 am by Peter Mahler
In another First Department decision earlier this month, the court in Newman v Newman affirmed a decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Barry R. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “The Court further finds that the part of plaintiff’s motion seeking to dismiss defendants’ first counterclaim (and sixth defense) alleging legal malpractice, as being time-barred by the three-year statute of limitations (see CPLR 214[6]; Stewart v Berger, 137 AD3d 1103 [2nd Dept 2016]), is granted, except to the extent that the first counterclaim seeks to offset as a shield for equitable recoupment purposes, a sum equal to an award of legal… [read post]
Neurim argued as a fall-back that Mylan could and should have appealed Marcus Smith J’s decision in Neurim v Mylan 2020 when it became apparent that the EP 443 divisional was going to be granted. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia A District Court of South Australia has granted a pre-action discovery to identify a person behind an anonymous WeChat account, to allow the prospective plaintiff to bring a claim for defamation, Yu v Yong [2022] SADC 10. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The Judge stated that in order to succeed with the summary judgment application, the [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 7:01 am by Edward B. Foley
But even if a state legislature were to adopt this misguided measure, Bush v. [read post]