Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 7561 - 7580 of 16,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
(That essay also explains the math that we used to derive the 40,100 percent interest rate stated above.)Our overall bottom line does not change, however, because the fundamental objection to all of the gimmicks has less to do with the exact interaction of the words of the key statutes than it does with a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation. [read post]
The one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 11:58 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
I first saw the news about Thursday’s decision affirming fair use in the Authors Guild v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:04 pm by Larry Catá Backer
In this way, I hope to be able to avoid the dual-risks of over-simplification and appearing too abstruse.I begin with the direct response: In terms of the original American ideology, I think that it would not be correct to speak either equal opportunity or equality. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 8:08 am
Over the last several years I have been considering the issue of corruption generally, --Soft Extra Territorialism and American Anti-Corruption Campaigns, Sept. 12, 2006; --Soft Extra Territorialism and Anti-Corruption Campaigns: On the Perverse Folly of Corrupt States, Sept. 15, 2006);--Rockwell International v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
She has been quoted to the effect that she hopes that the Biden Administration will support her position. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:37 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
In 1920, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
(Del; the voting results on the advisory vote are here); the complaint was filed in California state court (Witmer v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:31 am by Tara Hofbauer
This news follows a recent ruling in Latif v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
In another unusual development, Wisconsin filed a petition requesting that the Court rehear the petition for certiorari, perhaps in hopes that Fortas might be now willing to support the petition, but this request was also denied. [read post]