Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 7561 - 7580
of 12,701
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2015, 2:46 pm
We’re now working on the third series. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:04 am
(c) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to abrogate the decisions in In re Marriage of Davis (2015) 61 Cal.4th 846 and In re Marriage of Norviel (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 1152. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:30 am
He also declared that “Islam hates us” and that “we’re having problems with the Muslims, and we’re having problems with Muslims coming into the country. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 6:35 pm
These are some pretty impressive numbers and they’re on the rise. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 7:43 am
This trans-national group is composed of citizens, journalists, academics, activists, and any others whose primary concern is the pursuit of social justice. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 11:02 am
Not a difference of opinion. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 2:37 pm
Turns out we’re in good company: the Sentencing Commission staff hates the guideline too! [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 6:02 am
(Of course, you may play many other parts—advocate, campaigner, endorser, opinion-writer, etc.) [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 5:24 pm
It reproduced the open letter, but the inclusion of Bezos' e-mail address implicitly encouraged readers to contact the man with readers' opinions on the matter. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 10:05 am
· Engaging Public Librarians in Access to Justice. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 7:43 am
This trans-national group is composed of citizens, journalists, academics, activists, and any others whose primary concern is the pursuit of social justice. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:51 am
” This question is reminiscent of the challenge to the United States Supreme Court in defining obscenity and Justice Potter Stewart’s concurring opinion when he acknowledged the difficulty of articulating a standard, writing “I know it when I see it”, and then concluding that the movie in question was not obscene. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:38 pm
It's not twenty-first century justice. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 5:00 pm
We’re better than this. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
And this isn't just a hypothetical: the Supreme Court grants certiorari (or adds) particular issues all the time, and the dissenting justices on the Court have never (in my mind) said in response that since they disagree with that order, they're going to refuse to follow it. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
The Federal Patent Court has scheduled its [nullity] hearing for November 13, 2013.Defendant-Appellant argues that continued enforcement is no longer justified because the Regional Court's ruling would be reversed at least due to the invalidity of the Patent-in-Suit, as shown by the Federal Patent Court's preliminary opinion and a decision by the UK Court of Justice (Exh. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:29 pm
Circuit, and our current Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Roberts, once said, “Any time Judge Garland disagrees, you know you’re in a difficult area. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:45 am
In all cases, the company should consider obtaining express permission to re-publish, clearly attributing the information (views, opinions, etc.) to the author, and disclaiming any responsibility for the content. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 5:56 pm
My opinions now may perhaps change soon enough and probably differ from experienced upper years. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 3:23 pm
This Order directed EPA and the Corps to issue a proposed rule rescinding or revising the Clean Water Act, and directs the agencies to “consider interpreting the term ‘navigable waters’ . . . in a manner consistent with” Justice Scalia’s plurality opinion in Rapanos v. [read post]
