Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 7561 - 7580
of 21,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2008, 11:35 am
Jonathan Pink represented the defendants in Marketing Information Masters, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:04 pm
Defendants’ attorney says that while they are sympathetic to the family, they do not believe their client is legally responsible, the same way Budweiser wouldn’t be held liable for a drunk driving accident. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:04 pm
Defendants’ attorney says that while they are sympathetic to the family, they do not believe their client is legally responsible, the same way Budweiser wouldn’t be held liable for a drunk driving accident. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 9:07 am
The defendant hospital contended it should not be held vicariously liable for nursing care due to the plaintiff’s discontinuation of the case against the nurse, and that no triable issues of fact regarding nursing and neonatal care existed. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:41 am
And as the case shows, plaintiffs must prove not only that the injury was actually caused by the defendant’s conduct, but also that the accident was foreseeable or that the defendant should be held responsible. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 9:30 am
Under a strict liability analysis, an animal’s owner is liable for the injuries caused by their dog regardless of the owner’s negligence or knowledge of the dog’s history of aggression or past level of violence. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:30 pm
The first step your attorney will take will be to inform the defendant’s insurance company of the representation. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:30 pm
The first step your attorney will take will be to inform the defendant’s insurance company of the representation. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:30 pm
The first step your attorney will take will be to inform the defendant’s insurance company of the representation. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 6:06 am
In PLX, VC Laster held activist hedge fund Potomac Capital Partners II, L.P. liable for aiding and abetting the breach by its principal, Eric Singer, of his fiduciary duty to Potomac’s portfolio company, PLX Technology Inc. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:29 am
Finally, Part III argues that moral constraints of necessity and proportionality limit the use of force even against individuals who are morally liable to direct attack. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 12:06 pm
There, the First Appellate District noted, on facts indistinguishable from the present case, that the plaintiff’s injury did not come from the defendants’ equipment itself, but instead was released from products made or supplied by other manufacturers, though used in conjunction with the defendants’ equipment. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 12:15 am
NRS 78.138(7) holds directors liable if they can both rebut the business judgment rule's presumption of good faith and prove a breach of fiduciary duty involving intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of the law. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 10:35 pm
Consider the following examples: A New Jersey physician was forced to defend his access to family medical records without consent or authorization before the New Jersey Board of Medical Examiners resulting in defense costs and ultimately continuing education requirements for the physician; An Illinois hospital incurred significant legal fees to defend its disclosure of medical records in connection with the plaintiff’s divorce action. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:01 am
The defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:25 pm
When considering whether to depart from the general rule, we balance a number of considerations, including “the foreseeability of harm to the plaintiff, the degree of certainty that the plaintiff suffered injury, the closeness of the connection between the defendant’s conduct and the injury suffered, the moral blame attached to the defendant’s conduct, the policy of preventing future harm, the extent of the burden to the defendant and… [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 8:38 am
In NetTV v MARHedge, the High Court was faced with a slightly peculiar fact situation where there was an admittedly deliberate repudiatory breach of contract by the defendant, and the only question before the Court was whether the exemption clause in the contract excluded the defendant’s liability for the claimant’s lost profits. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:30 am
Second, the plaintiff must show its injuries are proximately caused by the defendant's conduct. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 12:00 am
Therefore, the courts determine that you are 20 percent liable for your injuries, but the defendant is 80 percent liable. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 12:00 am
Therefore, the courts determine that you are 20 percent liable for your injuries, but the defendant is 80 percent liable. [read post]
