Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 7561 - 7580
of 41,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2021, 6:30 am
Andrew Kent, Fordham University School of Law, has posted Lessons for Bivens and Qualified Immunity Debates from Nineteenth-Century Damages Litigation against Federal Officers, which appears in Notre Dame Law Review 96 (2021): 1755-1788:This Essay was written for a symposium marking the fiftieth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bivens v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 5:19 pm
Fla.) in Dershowitz v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 12:12 pm
Tal (1985) QB 67, 81; Willers v Joyce [2016] UKSC 44 § 9: “puisne judges are not technically bound by decisions of their peers, but they should generally follow a decision of a court of co-ordinate jurisdiction unless there is a powerful reason for not doing so. [read post]
25 May 2021, 8:18 am
From Separation of Hinduism from Our Schools v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 7:17 am
Accordingly, the risk of a serious or fatal truck crash is higher in our part of the country than in other states for truckers and anyone driving alongside these heavy and powerful machines. [read post]
25 May 2021, 6:27 am
In this post, Sarah Day, a senior associate with CMS, previews the decision awaited from the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Harcus Sinclair LLP v Your Lawyers Limited. [read post]
24 May 2021, 1:14 pm
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 3:56 am
Common-Law Dissolution Plaintiff Loses Fight Over Venue Last year I wrote about a federal court’s first-impression decision in Busher v Barry in which it applied the Burford abstention doctrine to dismiss, without prejudice to refiling in state court, the minority shareholders’ claim for common-law dissolution. [read post]
23 May 2021, 7:21 pm
Since the state where the judgment was given had power over the litigants, the judgments of its courts should be respected. [read post]
23 May 2021, 2:04 pm
” Sandberg v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 8:37 am
It was thus not surprising to see the reaction of European elites when an imperial order (not the United States) would presume to assert the sort of sovereign prerogatives that the EU assumed was beyond its power.3. [read post]
23 May 2021, 7:38 am
In Laufer v. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
We have decided that there is no power to hold any provision of the NSL to be unconstitutional or invalid as incompatible with the Basic Law and Bill of Rights. [read post]
21 May 2021, 4:21 pm
D. v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 6:28 am
Umphrey) (NYU Press 2021).Number of pages: 42 Posted: 18 May 2021Working Paper SeriesSherally MunshiGeorgetown University Law Center On Power & the Law: McGirt v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 4:00 am
Citing Newsday Inc. v Long Island Typographical Union No. 915, CWA, AFL-CIO, 915 F2d at 844-845, the Appellate Division noted that the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, held that an arbitral award was properly vacated under the public policy exception where an arbitrator reinstated a terminated employee who had engaged in multiple acts of sexual harassment. [read post]
21 May 2021, 4:00 am
Citing Newsday Inc. v Long Island Typographical Union No. 915, CWA, AFL-CIO, 915 F2d at 844-845, the Appellate Division noted that the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, held that an arbitral award was properly vacated under the public policy exception where an arbitrator reinstated a terminated employee who had engaged in multiple acts of sexual harassment. [read post]
21 May 2021, 3:30 am
Ford and eBay v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:03 pm
White House press secretary Jen Psaki affirmed President Biden’s commitment to codifying Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:01 pm
In the famous footnote 4 of United States v. [read post]
