Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 7561 - 7580
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2014, 5:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 5:36 am
Last week the United States Supreme Court in Fernandez v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
The United States Attorney’s Office also stated that it planned to 'use the video of the [en banc] argument as a training tool to reinforce the principle that all Assistant U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:48 am
As a result, the court relied heavily on an older California Supreme Court case, Miller v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:50 am
Two weeks ago, a divided panel of the Ninth Circuit declared California's law on carrying guns in public to be unconstitutional in Peruta v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 7:37 am
I previously posted here about a case in front of the United States Supreme Court that deals with how far does the rule from Georgia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 4:19 pm
Marley v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
California, 13-494. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:17 pm
United States, No. 13-403. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
Whyte of the Northern District of California. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:51 pm
United States) we see no ground for reaching a different conclusion here. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:03 pm
For more information, see EPIC: United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
California and U.S. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
United States] we see no ground for reaching a different conclusion here. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
For instance, back in 1985, Robert Levinson complained of a contract with the Eckerd Foundation for the management of the Okeechobee School for Boys in which “[v]irtually every” contract item concerned input activities and pertained to administrative/operational functions. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:30 am
The ruling in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:24 am
A case kicking around back them was United States v. [read post]
