Search for: "State v. B. V." Results 7561 - 7580 of 41,777
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2020, 10:26 am by Kevin Kaufman
The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
First, following Curistan v Times Newspapers [2009] QB 231, qualified privilege operates so that the relevant privileged words are ignored for defamation purposes, at least as far as meaning is concerned, except insofar as they provide context for non-privileged words [56]. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:14 am by Kingsley
Due to these concerns including the ones raised by the media (see here, here and here), INEC issued a press release which was also reported here and here, stating  its own position on the judgment. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 4:20 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen posts the cert. petition in Susan B. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 2:08 pm
United States, 335 U.S. 601, 614 (1949), in situations that are not addressed by the other five clauses of Rule 60(b). [read post]