Search for: "State v. L. A. T."
Results 7561 - 7580
of 9,948
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2011, 9:34 am
L. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 2:46 am
Additional commentary may be found at the corresponding TTABlog posting].Meckatzer Löwenbräu Benedikt Weiß KG v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:06 pm
Jeffrey Phillips’ 6-month suspension was due to various infractions, which I won’t go into here other than to say the Dissent had it right. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:52 am
Setting the Stage/Framework/Scope of Advertising and Labeling Stephen L. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:11 am
L. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
The trial court's original order entering the jury verdict is available on Westlaw as Liebeck v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
The Ninth Circuit’s precedent in United Steel Workers Int'l Union v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:03 pm
L. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
,” while at the same time concluding that the provisions of ICWA were inapplicable by stating that “these proceedings…actually escape applicable federal law on Indian Child Welfare. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
,” while at the same time concluding that the provisions of ICWA were inapplicable by stating that “these proceedings…actually escape applicable federal law on Indian Child Welfare. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
The Court also filled out its March 3 argument calendar by re-setting some previously granted cases: Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 4:55 am
Darren reviewed the issues of comparative advertising and obtaining unfair advantage through the use by a smell-alike perfume seller of the brand name of the famous perfume the scent of which was emulated by that smell-alike product -- the subject of the European Court of Justice ruling in Case C-487/07 L'Oreal v Bellure, excoriated by the referring court here. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
Learning Curve Int’l, Inc. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:21 pm
L'Oreal, S.A., 129 F.3d 588, 592 (Fed. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 12:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:05 pm
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm
Just as T’s payments to the rent account wouldn’t extinguish T’s liability for rent for that period (and hence HB entitlement) neither would a payment to the rent account by anyone else, including L. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm
As will become clear, I lean towards the second option… RH v North Tyneside Council v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (HB) [2010] UKUT 462 (AAC) This was a housing benefit appeal, indeed the second HB appeal related to this matter. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm
Forbath, Courting the State: An Essay for Morton Horwitz 7 Robert W. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:16 pm
Solicitor General Malcolm L. [read post]
