Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 7561 - 7580 of 8,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2010, 9:11 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Employer-Employee Relationship H-1B regulations currently require that a United States employer establish that it has an employer-employee relationship with the beneficiary of the petition. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:25 am by Jim Livesay
The H-1B regulations currently require that a United States employer establish that it has an employer-employee relations with respect to the beneficiary, as indicated by the fact that it may hire, pay, fire, supervise or otherwise control the work of any such employee. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 10:59 am by Brett Trout
Patents are drafted by patent attorneys, who receive special training, have undergraduate studies in a science and pass a special Bar exam to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 9:29 am by Jim Livesay
Accordingly, USCIS will continue to process petitions filed to: Extend the amount of time a current H-1B worker may remain in the United States; Change the terms of employment for current H-1B workers; Allow current H-1B workers to change employers; or Allow current H-1B workers to work concurrently in a second H-1B position. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:44 pm by Judicial Watch Blog
The jihadists couldn’t be repatriated to their home country because Beijing considered them terrorists and would torture them and Judge Urbina, determined to liberate them, released them in the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 10:23 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
United States [docket; cert. petition, PDF], in which the Court will consider whether a district court may enter a restitution order beyond the time limit prescribed in 18 USC &sect 3664(d)(5) [text]. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 9:18 am by Erin Miller
United States (09-367). [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 11:38 am by Mark Murakami
The briefs recently filed are: Amicus United States of America's Brief in Support of Petitioners Amicus Association of American Railroads' Brief in Support of Petitioners Amicus International Group of Protection and Indemnity (P&I) Clubs, et al., Brief in Support of Petitioners Amicus World Shipping Council's Brief in Support of Petitioners These briefs favor the contract provisions over the railway… [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:02 pm by John Elwood
As Noreiga's reply brief states, "[t]he decision below affects the rights of hundreds of prisoners in United States' custody. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:18 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Second, the revised scope of jurisdiction under the MCA 2009 extneds commission eligibility to persons who were part of al Qaeda or the Taliban and those who "purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 9:13 am by Lyle Denniston
On the specific issue of presidential detention power, the majority explicitly accepted the Bush Administration definition (adopted also by Judge Leon) that the power extends to anyone who was "part of or supporting Taliban or Al-Qaeda forces, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:03 pm by Big Tent Democrat
The Supreme Court asked the United States for its view on whether cert should be granted on the questions the NFL wanted answered. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:39 pm by ALeonard
Congress over the past few decades to make it more and more difficult for an individual to be granted refugee status in the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 5:04 pm by Erin Miller
The Solicitor General then files a brief in the case expressing the views of the United States government. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:09 pm by Anna Christensen
Once certiorari is granted, the petitioner generally has forty-five days to file his opening brief, known as the petitioner's brief. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 11:42 am by LindaMBeale
United States, 2008 WL 2139008) but no court of appeals has yet so held. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 9:59 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion and Order in the following matter: OP 09-0610, 2009 MT 439, THE OFFICE OF THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER, Petitioner, v. [read post]