Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant" Results 7561 - 7580 of 9,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2010, 5:53 am by INFORRM
  Such statements can then be used to support the making of a consent order. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by SHG
This title phrase, glommed from the non-precedential decision of the Third Circuit in State Troopers v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:45 pm by Matthew Hill
It is entitled to have regard to them in assessing needs (R v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:55 pm by Lyle Denniston
”  Such an organization must use at least 90 percent of its funds to provide scholarships or grants to students going to private schools, up through high school. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:38 pm by Steve Hall
Two years ago, when a splintered Supreme Court approved lethal injection as a means of execution in Baze v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:13 am by Sheppard Mullin
 While this proposition has seldom been addressed, the 1997 ruling in English v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:13 am by Sheppard Mullin
 While this proposition has seldom been addressed, the 1997 ruling in English v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 1:34 pm
Most of us in the trade would have said to CBP – what were you thinking? [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 4:47 pm
Now the Department of Justice (DOJ) has weighed in, against the patent office, which granted the target patents. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:36 pm by Kelly
Productions LLC v Aftermath Records (IP Osgoode) District Court S D New York shuts down LimeWire file-sharing service: Arista v Lime Wire (Shades of Gray) (TorrentFreak) (ArsTechnica) (Recording Industry vs. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 5:17 am
Robson v Robson [2010] EWCA Civ 1171 may ultimately be best remembered for the language used by Lord Justice Ward in his judgment, rather than for any particular point of law. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
  As Sossamon has unfolded in the Court, this issue is the one that will be addressed, at some level. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:57 pm by David Smith
Hanley v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council is an appeal against the service of a Prohibition Order. [read post]