Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc."
Results 7561 - 7580
of 8,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2010, 4:02 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed a preliminary injunction barring a senior bakery executive from beginning employment with a competitor, finding that the “likely” disclosure of bakery’s trade secrets to the new employer was sufficient harm to support the injunction.Proposed ITAR amendment regarding dual nationals and third-country nationalsWinston & Strawn LLPThe United States Department of State is proposing to amend the International… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
In the final petition consolidated in the Branzburg proceedings, the Court considered the petition for certiorari of the United States from a decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Caldwell v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 6:06 pm
Considering that the Supreme Court instructs that privileges are “not lightly created nor expansively construed, for they are in derogation of the search for truth,” United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 10:24 am
Stratoflex, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:31 pm
Nardi, 2012 BCPC 318; R v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am
Indeed, the United States attempted and failed to make such a showing in Grupo Mexicano. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 7:39 am
Dep’t of Transp., Div. of Admin. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
Hudbay Minerals Inc, para. 4). [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
Hudbay Minerals Inc, para. 4). [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 12:43 pm
Leasing, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:41 pm
Further, as the state high court explained in Dorshkind v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
For the facts, see United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 12:26 pm
(Afro-IP) Canada Supreme Court of British Columbia rules linking to content not republication in defamation case: Crookes v Wikimedia Foundation Inc (ipblog.ca) (EXCESS COPYRIGHT) (Michael Geist) The fight for Canada's digital future (Michael Geist) Canadian podcasting royalty down but not out (Michael Geist) China Microsoft anti-piracy efforts: Chinese Windows users accuse Microsoft of hacking their computers (Techdirt) Europe EPO… [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
. * * * Today’s topic – “Regulating Finance in a Changing Administrative State” – is no doubt a timely one, but also one that could easily serve as my job description. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
” The motion cites the 2001 California Supreme Court Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
The second is whether diverging legal frameworks between Member States hamper the principle of free movement of goods. [read post]
