Search for: "W. D." Results 7561 - 7580 of 13,768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review, W. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
  You don’t wаnt them in your dwelling. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:13 pm by admin
McDowell asks, rhetorically, “[W]hat are acts such as providing quality of service (QoS) management and content filters if not editorial functions? [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 12:39 am
Florida Power & Light Co., Inc. 1995 WL 91531 (S.D.Fla.) aff'd, 101 F.3d 708 (11th Cir.1996), the court explicitly rejected a free exercise of religion challenge. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 11:14 am by Susan Hennessey
The Committee voted 13-to-2 to extend the FAA without further amendment to the underlying law, over the dissent of Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Mark Udall (D-Col.) who advocated additional privacy and transparency amendments. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:00 am by jonathanturley
, voted to challenge the certification of the 2004 election results and then-President George W. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:12 am by jonathanturley
Indeed, if opposing views were allowed, then Republicans likely would call for the testimony of committee Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), who voted to challenge the certification of the 2004 results of President George W. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 10:39 pm by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Dicha exención deberá estar incluida en el encasillado número 16 del Formulario 499R-2/W-2PR, “Comprobante de Retención” (“Comprobante de Retención”) del contribuyente. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 6:45 am
Using that number, the benefit would increase your total revenue as reported on your form W-2 by nearly $1000 (the actual total is $924). [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 5:36 am by Scott Gearity
Average processing time 30 days. 8:58 Iraq licensing stats -- 112 applications, 76 approved, 36 RWA'd, 0 denied. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am by Kelly
Van Valkenburgh (TTABlog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: An ugly trademark ownership decision: Gemmer v. [read post]