Search for: "Wells v. Wells" Results 7561 - 7580 of 97,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2024, 1:43 pm
But that could be because people who abuse during the marriage are far more likely to then stalk after the marriage collapses than non-abusers -- a result that would (again) correspond to my preexisting intuition on this front as well. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 1:34 pm
  So that's a little push that hints at what the trial court might well permissibly find. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 12:03 pm
 No such weirdness.Okay, well, a little weirdness. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
  Sure, we know full well that just because you've once been mentally ill, that doesn't necessarily mean that you're currently mentally ill, and so (arguably) the presumption against you owning a gun shouldn't apply. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 12:26 pm
 Because both under the Court of Appeal's reasoning as well as under the statute, it does seem like we may well be making it very difficult to enforce these types of settlement agreements. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
 Who concurs in the result only.I appreciate the confession of error as well. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:10 pm
As a matter of both English grammar as well as statutory interpretation, I would think that (A) is clearly different than (B). [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:41 am
 While the district court, which sat through the trial, could well have refused to award costs, it wasn't an abuse of discretion to go the other way either. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
On December 28, 2023, Vice Chancellor Will of the Delaware Court of Chancery rendered an important decision in Kellner v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
On December 28, 2023, Vice Chancellor Will of the Delaware Court of Chancery rendered an important decision in Kellner v. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 7:01 am by Ezra Rosser
New Article: Elenore Wade, Extractive Welfare: Medicaid Statutory Recovery Formulas After Gallardo V. [read post]