Search for: "ACE Limited"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,020
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2016, 4:50 pm
In respect of the approach to proportionality of interference with ECHR rights, the judge cited Lord Sumption in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700: [20] … the question depends on an exacting analysis of the factual case advanced in defence of the measure, in order to determine (i) whether its objective is sufficiently important to justify the limitation of a fundamental right; (ii) whether it is rationally connected to the objective; (iii) whether a less… [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:13 pm
General Warranty Deeds have no limitation. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:43 am
Business side: availability of legal tools was directly relevant to getting into these markets—ACS, 4k, over the top TV, streaming TV through authentication—1201 a factor in all those things. [read post]
19 May 2016, 3:22 am
Secondly, the Court of Appeal was wrong to refer to a “limited public interest” in the story, finding that there is no public interest at all in the disclosure of “private sexual encounters even if they involve infidelity or more than one person at the same time, however famous the individual(s) involved. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:16 pm
From 1 April 2016 local housing allowance rules will apply to social housing rents which includes the shared room rate limit for any single person under 35 years old without children. [read post]
6 May 2016, 6:17 am
Moreover, the Board saw no reason to limit application of the fraudulent conveyance doctrine to corporate officers and shareholders. [read post]
5 May 2016, 1:00 pm
The event is free and open to the public, but seating is limited. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:44 am
With dozens of different brand name frozen vegetable products being recalled, and the sick stretching from Washington, California and Maryland (with the numbers and places likely to rise), what do you need to know about this very nasty bug? [read post]
2 May 2016, 10:06 am
Like Justice Friedman’s ruling last month in ACE Securities v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:30 am
Despite its astounding $8 billion cost (including Warm Springs), BART to Silicon Valley will offer limited new connections in the polycentric geography of Silicon Valley. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:09 am
Whether a trial likewise will be required in Mickenberg will have to await the outcome of the court’s ruling following limited discovery. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:09 am
Whether a trial likewise will be required in Mickenberg will have to await the outcome of the court’s ruling following limited discovery. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 7:54 am
This section limits copyright protection for these types of artistic works, when more than 50 copies have been made, to 25 years. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 1:53 pm
When the law was enacted, there were large technical limits to storing data online. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:12 am
While claims for confidentiality generally fail once the information has passed into the public domain (see Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109), the law provides greater protection to privacy rights. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:15 pm
On its face, Family Court Act § 1028 does not limit a hearing only to parents whose children have been placed in the custody of a governmental agency. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 3:00 am
The trial judge dismissed Mr Mohamud’s claim against Morrison’s, applying the test in Lister v Hesley Hall Limited [2002] 1 AC 215 which established that for vicarious liability to be found there must be a sufficiently close connection between the wrongdoing and the employment, so that it would be fair and just to hold the employer vicariously liable for the employee’s actions. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
Cravath said the incident, which occurred last summer, involved a “limited breach” of its systems and that the firm is “not aware that any of the information that may have been accessed has been used improperly. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 1:34 pm
[Hat Tip: Ace of Spades]Original content copyright © InsureBlog [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:02 am
When we examined Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A, comment k (1965), in our 2011 research post “Comment K, Some of the Way,” we remarked about how it said “a lot of things,” including: (1) that one can’t design away unavoidable risks, (2) that unavoidably unsafe products aren’t considered “unreasonably dangerous” for purposes of strict liability, and (3) that such products are “especially common” in the prescription medical… [read post]
