Search for: "APPLICATION OF SHARP"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,432
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
On Wednesday 29 February and Thursday 1 March 2012, there was an application in the case of Qema v NGN Ltd before Sharp J. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am
On the same day the oral renewal of the application for permission to appeal in the case of Weston v Bates was refused by Sharp LJ. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
The application was dismissed. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm
So it seems to us that we can have a hearing in public while still protecting the privacy of the Appellant” On 22 March 2011 Mrs Justice Sharp heard an application in what appears to be a privacy case – RJA v AJR. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 12:28 pm
The applicable limits will be determined separately for each auction. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:31 am
Birrs J therefore refused the strikeout application. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 3:17 am
Applicant then filed a petition for reconsideration, asserting that the MOH of the 12/29/22 trial was incorrect and factually incomplete, and that the Appeals Board had obstructed the Applicant’s due process rights by not interviewing percipient witnesses to the trial proceedings. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 4:58 pm
Both stories revealed the applicant’s identity. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am
On 13 July 2012 there is an application in the case of Singh v Singh. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 10:16 am
The substance of the application for permission to appeal was that the Circuit Judge and the Court of Appeal [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
The Jameel strike out application by the defendant anti-spam group was dismissed. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:21 pm
Oppenheim noted that the demand, especially in the FB2 category has exceeded his expectations after the sharp forward movement at the end of 2010. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 5:41 pm
It was continued by Sharp J on 12 October 2009. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
R (on the application of Gaunt) v OFCOM, heard 11 May 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Toulson and Etherton LJJ). [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
On 30 October 2014, the Court of Appeal (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) handed down judgment in Reed Elsevier v Bewry. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:54 pm
The rule or regulation alleged to have been breached must be a specific, positive command and be applicable to the facts of the case. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:33 pm
Merck Sharp & Dohme (C-119/22) made by the Finnish Market Court in February 2022 (see here for an English translation of the referring decision) and Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 9:46 am
This suggests a rather sharp line between pre-issuance and post-issuance conduct. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am
David Kappos The bottom line is that the United States patent office has been swamped with a rising flood of applications over the past 20 years: 174,711 applications were filed in 1990 and 100,975 patents were issued. 478,649 applications were filed In 2010 and 219,614 applications were issued. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 1:54 pm
But the parties are in sharp disagreement about what those top-line figures should be. [read post]
