Search for: "ART GRAHAM"
Results 741 - 760
of 792
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2007, 11:19 am
Graham Factorslong-felt need unsolvedno prior art teaching foundproduct sold worldwide "Bunny" [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 2:56 pm
The journal entry from this meeting, dated 8-18-92, describes the experience in a way Graham Greene never could: "Hubba-hubba. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 6:01 am
The search uncovered 189 pieces of fine jewelry and 10 works of art, which were, according to an appraisal, valued at $242,767. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 2:21 am
Graham, Southern District of Florida, and a former certified legal intern with the Dade County Public Defender's Office, Mr. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 4:43 am
He crafted religiously-inspired art. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 1:27 pm
The Federal Circuit's decision turned on its finding of clear error in the district court's determination of the level of ordinary skill in the art, one of the Graham factors. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 3:49 am
Patent No. 4,687,777, entitled "Thiazolidinedione derivatives, useful as antidiabetic agents"); confirmation that the Graham factors "still control an obviousness inquiry" in view of KSR; "structural similarity between claimed and prior art subject matter, proved by combining references or otherwise, where the prior art gives reason or motivation to make the claimed compositions, creates a prima facie case of obviousness"; detailed application… [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:47 am
The Court stated that the Graham v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:18 pm
Graham Primary Law: In the 1966 case of Graham v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:38 am
In a case applying the new obviousness framework from KSR to structurally similar chemical compounds, the court affirmed a district court decision that claimed compounds would not have been obvious in light of the prior art. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 10:11 am
* My former editor Scott Graham, of San Francisco's The Recorder, dropped a note about a new product created by one of his friends. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 8:11 am
” Motivation to Combine Prior Art References to Achieve the Claimed Invention In conducting the obviousness analysis (citing Dystar), the CAFC first stated: Subsumed within the Graham factors is a subsidiary requirement articulated by this court that where, as here, all claim limitations are found in a number of prior art references, the burden falls on the challenger of the patent to show by clear and convincing evidence that a skilled artisan… [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:15 pm
The Court reaffirmed Graham v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 12:03 am
" The Graham factors include: 1) the scope and content of the prior art; 2) the skill level of a person of ordinary skill in the art; 3) the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art's teachings; and 4) any objective indications of nonobviousness (such as commercial success, long felt, but unresolved needs and the failure of others). [read post]
30 May 2007, 7:06 pm
That austere standard, absent from the statute and incompatible with case law of the Supreme Court (including Graham v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
Teleflex"A unanimous Supreme Court rolled back the Federal Circuit's teaching, suggestion or motivation obviousness test in favor of the Court's prior, and substantially broader, test as set forth in Graham v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
Alexander Graham Bell, but not Meucci, is mentioned, and of course the Selden patent is brought up. [read post]
8 May 2007, 10:37 pm
The ultimate judgment of obviousness is a legal determination. (...)Where, as here, the content of the prior art, the scope of the patent claim, and the level of ordinary skill in the art are not in material dispute, and the obviousness of the claim is apparent in light of these factors, summary judgment is appropriate. [read post]
7 May 2007, 3:29 am
In Ruiz, as in Dembiczak, we vacated a conclusion of obviousness because the factfinder failed to make Graham factor findings. 234 F.3d at 660. [read post]
4 May 2007, 9:38 pm
Graham, 383 U.S., at 17, 86 S. [read post]
