Search for: "Alexander v. United States"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 7:06 am
: how Lowrey v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:55 am
” At National Review, Michael Brendan Dougherty explains why he has “started to think that Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy may be the one man preventing the United States from political breakdown. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
That discussion is as possible within non-state governance units as it is within states. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:35 pm
Federal sovereign immunity doctrine holds that no one can sue the United States without its consent—sovereign immunity is thus pleaded around by suing officers. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:16 am
Trial practice » United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 6:30 am
But peaceful coexistence in a political unit offers itself as an ideal state of being. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Alexander, No. 07-1758 A sentence for possessing crack cocaine with the intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not commit a plain error in designating defendant a career offender for sentencing purposes as he committed a prior crime of violence, and he otherwise satisfied the criteria necessary to be considered a career offender; and 2) the sentence was otherwise reasonable. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:17 am
Brown; State v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:30 am
” As the district court noted in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 8:33 am
United States, No. 23-402) didn't consider the Appointments Clause at all, so it would not be a good vehicle for a grant of certiorari. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:08 am
Moreover, in Chisholm v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am
Alan Rozenshtein flagged a forthcoming article he wrote for the Yale Law Journal Forum arguing that the Supreme Court was wrong to conclude that the government needed a warrant to collect large quantities of cell-phone location data in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 6:19 am
This position echoes the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) stance in Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights (Costa Rica v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
The privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States are denied to these plaintiffs by the government’s unconstitutional actions described here. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
On 29 June 2017 the Culture Secretary Karen Bradley made a statement to the House of Commons stating that she was “minded” to refer the proposed takeover of Sky plc by 21st Century Fox Inc to the Competition and Markets Authority on plurality grounds. [read post]
