Search for: "Arnold Doe" Results 741 - 760 of 2,488
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am by Tom Pritchard
Critically, does (A) qualify both (1) and (2), or just (2)? [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 10:30 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Board Certified Family Law Specialist Matt Arnold answers the question: “What are my custody rights if the other parent moves? [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:41 am
I Social media, "WikiLeaks" and false news in the 18th century: Thomas Jefferson and the "Mazzei letter" I Does the economic impact of SPCs necessitate SPC Regulation reform? [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:37 pm
Joan Winkler informed Pickett that her son Seth was among the men in the photographs, and according to Pickett, told him that Seth knew that the property had been sold.Pickett provided the photographs from the game camera to Texas Parks and Wildlife Game Warden Arnold Pinales and informed him that the photographs depicted trespassers who had been poaching on his property without his consent. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 1:22 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Though we might consider our pets part of the family, the fact is that the law does not. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 10:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 9011 (MD PA, Jan. 23, 2017), a Pennsylvania federal district court dismissed a claim by a Hebrew-Israelite inmate that he was wrongly denied kosher bag meals on the Fast of Gedaliah.In Arnold v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 11:25 pm
 Arnold J then went on to suggest that in the present case, a product whose active ingredients are tenofovir disoproxil (TD) and another therapeutic agent (such as emtricitabine) “is not protected by the Patent within the meaning of Article 3(a) because the combination, as distinct from TD, does not embody the inventive advance of the Patent. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
  The Soup Obviousness over the CGK Alone Andrew highlighted two judgments from Birss J which suggest that he does not particularly warm to a pleading of obviousness over CGK alone. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 6:45 am by Brian Cordery
In Pharmacia, it was held that an SPC would not be available where the product had been approved as a veterinary medicinal product prior to 18 June 1992 while in Yissum, the Court held that “product” must be interpreted strictly such that it does not include intended therapeutic use. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm
What to Do With Illegally Obtained Recordings in Domestic Violence and Other Family Law Situations I've been doing this family law business for a long time, and over those years I've seen a lot of attempted over-reaches by the parties. [read post]