Search for: "Austin v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2015, 3:58 am
In Shapiro v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
DeMarco, etc., respondent.WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS in the nature of an application to release Susai Francis from the custody of the Sheriff of Suffolk County.New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, NY (Jordan Wells, Paige Austin, Mariana Kovel, Christopher Dunn, and Scout Katovich of counsel), and American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, NY (Omar C. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Would that be reviewable by a court, given that it involves a question of the validity to state law? [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 6:12 pm
Aymond of the Catholic Diocese of Austin. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 9:59 am
" Bhuiyan's lawsuit, Bhuiyan v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 3:35 am
Metro Office has the latest on the Persuader Rule, the Supreme Court’s 4-4 tie decision in Friedrichs v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:13 am
Yesterday’s ruling in Fisher v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
In an op-ed for the Austin American Statesman, David Gans discusses Fisher v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 9:56 am
Duncan v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
It noted, quoting Justice Byron White’s concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
University of Texas, Austin (II) OT 2014 – Zivotofsky v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:45 am
”In its 2019 Bucklew v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 3:13 pm
Austin v Southwark LBC [2009] EWCA Civ 66 provided that the tenancy ended on the date of possession unless restored within the life of the tenant. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 3:13 pm
Austin v Southwark LBC [2009] EWCA Civ 66 provided that the tenancy ended on the date of possession unless restored within the life of the tenant. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am
The state claims NetChoice said ONLY those three entities are covered. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 10:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:00 pm
-Austin Mar, 2, 2011, no pet.) [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:55 am
The opinion is styled, Stephen Burrell v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am
mod=googlenews_wsj, on United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:51 am
The only reason to oppose this bill is as a back-door means of criminalizing youthful gay relations, since after Lawrence v. [read post]
