Search for: "B. Parker"
Results 741 - 760
of 873
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2007, 9:48 pm
§2.03, Comment b - The draft takes the position (contrary to most courts, most recently, Blain v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
The finding of the Parker Commission was overturned by the Federal Court in 2004 in Stevens v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 2:06 am
Sections 221, 221-a, 221-b, 221-bb, 221-c, 221-d, 221-e, 2 221-f, 221-g, 221-h, 221-i and 223 of the judiciary law are REPEALED and 3 a new section 221 is added to read as follows: 4 § 221. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
The Interplay between the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause: Is the Supreme Court’s Test for “Public Use” Merely Rational Basis? [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Hawkins, No. 06-4061 "Conviction and sentence for traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct with a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2423(b), are affirmed over claims that: 1) section 2423(b) is an unconstitutional exercise of the Commerce Power; and 2) the district court erred in relying upon defendant's plea agreement with the government to deny his motions attacking the constitutionality of section 2423(b) on… [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
HSBC BANK USA, N.A. v CRUM No. 3:14-CV-3522-B USDC Tex. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
Johnson, 11-1053, a state-on-top habeas case out of the Third Circuit; Parker, Warden v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
The immunization step of the '739 patent, like updating the alarm limit in Parker v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
In the August 2010 volume of The Colorado Lawyer, Ronald M. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:00 pm
Goquen, 415 U.S. 566, 572–73 (1974); Parker v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 1:54 pm
March 5, 2009); Parker v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:44 am
” 750 ILCS 5/502(b) “A settlement agreement can be set aside if it is shown that the agreement was procured through coercion, duress or fraud, or if the agreement is unconscionable. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 7:22 pm
B. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
John Elwood reviews the first relists of 2019. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
B. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:49 pm
The Parker Commission recommended this in 1935, and the government of day approved it for reasons that are essentially just as valid today as they were more than 80 years ago.How can it help small businesses to potentially have to negotiate separately with SOCAN and RE:SOUND who have millions a year to spend on legal fees and other costs associated with collective administration and pushing revenues up? [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 2:00 am
See Parker v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:04 am
Ohio June 17, 2008); Parker v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
Ohio June 17, 2008); Parker v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:13 am
Parker—held that a tippee must know of the personal benefit received by the tipper. [read post]
