Search for: "Barnett v. Barnett"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,956
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2014, 8:27 am
"] Other aspects of the dispute that had intersting and recurring social media tweaks: other public employee cases have raised the similar issue of whether the employee was speaking as a citizen or an employee; the law is employer-favorable, but I would not be surprised to see an appeals court give her another chance (this aspect of the dispute vaguely reminds me of Bland v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:09 am
Noting that the Supreme Court, in Barnett v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:03 pm
Truth and Illusion in the Fracking DebateFrac(k)ing, Parr v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am
Latimer v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 6:38 am
Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 633-634 (1943) [the case securing a right not to salute the flag -EV]. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 11:45 am
Friscia v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:50 pm
” PLF contended that, once the Supreme Court in NFIB v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 11:28 am
CUS Nashville Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Solis v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 8:23 am
On the question of whether communications metadata is protected by the right to privacy, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights decided in Escher v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 11:33 am
” In Heffner v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 10:54 am
The court, in a case called Kinney v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 10:10 am
Garcia v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:03 am
(See Laurie Anstis posting on Daniel Barnett blog here.) [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm
Case citation: Munroe v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:12 pm
Barnette v US Architects, LLP, 2014 WL 3695257 (IN App. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 2:29 pm
Barnett, 63 M.J. 388, 394 (C.A.A.F. 2006); United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 2:29 pm
Barnett, 63 M.J. 388, 394 (C.A.A.F. 2006); United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:36 pm
However, in exercising the discretion to impute income to a party, a Support Magistrate is required to provide a clear record of the source from which the income is imputed and the reasons for such imputation based on Matter of Barnett v Ruotolo and Matter of Genender v Genender. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 10:46 am
His defense counsel was Case Barnett. [read post]
