Search for: "Barnett v. State" Results 741 - 760 of 1,004
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
But "Ohio State" has echoes of one of the key cases cited in support of the mandate: the 1942 decision in Wickard v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am by Graeme Hall
In the courts: Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (30 March 2011): Supreme Court: Teachers employed by Sec of State to work abroad at European Schools entitled to the protection against unfair dismissal – see the Education Law Blog. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 9:57 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Beckon Employee Blogging Risks Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 2:48 pm by Sandy Levinson
To the contrary, I agree with the Court’s decision in Marsh v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
., Frankfurter's opinions first in Gobitis and then his angry and anguished dissent in Barnette that helped to establish the split within liberalism between those who believed in "judicial restraint" and those who were beginning to rally around what came to be called "Footnote 4" liberalism instantiated in such decisions as Brown and then, perhaps most strikingly, Baker v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 6:10 am
I found a recent Missouri case, though, which indicates they're not available in every state. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm by Ilya Somin
Indeed, Dale and I (along with several other federalism scholars, including VC bloggers Randy Barnett and Jonathan Adler) filed an amicus brief in Windsor v. [read post]
[v]  The shortened timeframe for creditors to file claims increases the likelihood that the new owners will be able to acquire a clean title to the property. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  “The fact that this decision was apparently political, rather than legal, completely undermines its legitimacy as a precedent,” vented Randy Barnett, counsel for the Republican state officials who brought the case. [read post]