Search for: "Barnett v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,006
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am
In the courts: Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (30 March 2011): Supreme Court: Teachers employed by Sec of State to work abroad at European Schools entitled to the protection against unfair dismissal – see the Education Law Blog. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:18 am
State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 11:28 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 9:57 am
Beckon Employee Blogging Risks Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:41 pm
Futures v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 2:48 pm
To the contrary, I agree with the Court’s decision in Marsh v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 6:10 am
I found a recent Missouri case, though, which indicates they're not available in every state. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
After all, Chevron v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
., Frankfurter's opinions first in Gobitis and then his angry and anguished dissent in Barnette that helped to establish the split within liberalism between those who believed in "judicial restraint" and those who were beginning to rally around what came to be called "Footnote 4" liberalism instantiated in such decisions as Brown and then, perhaps most strikingly, Baker v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm
Indeed, Dale and I (along with several other federalism scholars, including VC bloggers Randy Barnett and Jonathan Adler) filed an amicus brief in Windsor v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:03 am
Tompkins and Miranda v. [read post]
Unconstitutional to Consider Husband’s Refusal to Give Religious Divorce (Get) When Granting Support
29 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
In Avitzur v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Barnette (1943) Wooley v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 12:38 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:00 pm
[v] The shortened timeframe for creditors to file claims increases the likelihood that the new owners will be able to acquire a clean title to the property. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 7:00 am
Barnett v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Download.aspx (delaware.gov) Claim limitation that patent applicant added to avoid examiner’s rejection made a “material” change, barring use of earlier application to set patent’s priority date. 23-1147.OPINION.5-23-2024_2322401.pdf (uscourts.gov) Part owner of trademark owner lacked right to sue to cancel similar trademarks. 23-1383.OPINION.5-23-2024_2322382.pdf (uscourts.gov) Federal Trade Commission sues Live Nation for monopolization and unlawful exclusive… [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:30 am
Daniel Barnett’s regular news alert brought the case of Aberdeen City Council v McNeill to my attention. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am
The blogosphere reported yesterday that Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, has condemned the ruling as the Court’s most partisan since 2000’s Bush v. [read post]
