Search for: "Booker v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,083
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2007, 1:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 1:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 11:38 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:32 am
" See United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
State, 769 So. 2d at 986 .................................................................................................................7 Booker v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
State, 769 So. 2d at 986 .................................................................................................................7 Booker v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:27 am
ruling in US v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 8:41 pm
There is an ironic symmetry to United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:24 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 4:48 am
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 12:59 pm
A snippet from the paper's abstract follows: "In the two years since United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 4:33 pm
Booker," and here is the full abstract:In the two years since United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 9:35 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:27 pm
Helpfully, this opinion provides this effective account of the state of Rule 32(h) after Booker in the course of articulating the First Circuit's approach: It appears that only the Seventh Circuit has held that Rule 32 no longer requires notice even for departures, having concluded that, after Booker, "the concept of departures [is] 'obsolete' and 'beside the point.'" United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:11 am
US v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 6:16 am
" Olmstead v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 5:51 am
Until 2005, moreover, when the Supreme Court outlawed the juvenile death penalty under the Eighth Amendment in the case of Roper v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 1:02 pm
Commentors here have done a great job highlighting the practical craziness of the Fifth Circuit's adoption of a "plain error" approach to reasonableness review in US v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:40 am
As noted in this prior post, a Sixth Circuit panel earlier this month indicated that all three members would strongly recommend" en banc review of the "important question" of "whether the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement violates United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 5:54 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
