Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 741 - 760 of 10,125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2011, 1:36 am by Matthew Flinn
The authority relied on by the Government included a Court of Appeal decision (R (Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2002] EWCA Civ 1868 – “the PH case”) and three High Court decisions (R (G) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2004] EWHC 2193 (Admin), R v Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2004] EWHC 2194 (Admin) and IT v Secretary of… [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:57 am by ISAAC RICHARDSON
The decisions so far On the first issue, the courts below were necessarily bound by the principle espoused by the House of Lords in R v Bancoult (no 2) [2009] 1 AC 453: that declarations of application attach not to the land which is contained in the territory of the signatory state, but instead to the ‘political entities’ about which the declaration is made; with the result that a declaration lapses whenever a ‘new political entity’ is formed. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:12 am by Jacob Wirz
The major questions doctrine seems to know no bounds. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:30 pm by Jordan Bublick
  The 11th Circuit previously explained in the case of United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 7:10 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Like this one, though it may seem unfair to the employees who are bound by the ruling.The case is ABM Industry Groups, LLC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:14 am by Kendall Gray
In a quartet recent opinions the court asserted federal power, twice in unanimous opinions whacking errant state supreme courts for stepping out of bounds. [read post]