Search for: "Britain v. Britain" Results 741 - 760 of 1,618
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2009, 6:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: UK: No ‘3 strikes’ disconnection for UK pirates according to IP Minister David Lamy (TorrentFreak) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) UK: ‘Digital Britain Interim Report’ - law will force ISPs to pass file-sharing data to record labels (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Ars… [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2011] UKSC 6 (9 February 2011): Supreme Court updates Pinnock (article 8 and council possession) judgment, re order and costs. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Hate speech What has replaced the two offences in Great Britain, in effect, are laws against religious hate speech. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:46 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Indeed, the UK must still allow at least some prisoners the vote, as required by the 2005 judgment in Hirst v UK (No.2) and the 2010 judgment in Greens & MT v UK. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
Religion Media Centre: Rishi Sunak, Britain’s first Hindu prime minister. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm by INFORRM
* Cripps v Vakras – $450,000 ($100,000 aggravated damages) * Pedavoli v Fairfax Media – $350,000 – hard copy and online * Polias v Ryall – $340,000 (Facebook and gossip) * North Coast Children’s Home Inc v Martin – $250,000 * Tassone v Kirkham – $176,408.81 * Fisher v Channel Seven Sydney – $125,000 (Today Tonight) * Visscher… [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 12:13 pm by Luke Goodrich
Nine of the 13 colonies had one, as did Great Britain. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 8:43 am by Laura H. Juillet
       there is an organised grouping of employees in Great Britain which has as its principal purpose the carrying out of the activities concerned on behalf of the client; b. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:31 am
"In a recent decision in Great Britain in Nestle v Dualit, a European patent was held invalid over its own priority document. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 6:19 am by Florian Mueller
Huawei that British courts can present implementers with the alternatives of accepting a global license agreement "made in Britain" or being forced out of the UK market? [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am by Garrett Hinck
On Monday, the Supreme Court granted cert. in Microsoft v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV, at 17; Case C-251/95 SABEL v Puma at 18-19). [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
” In preparation for oral arguments in United States v. [read post]