Search for: "C. P.1" Results 741 - 760 of 11,725
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Unknown
D., t. 105, p. 666; sala C, 25/2/77, "Machiánenfabrik A. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:09 pm
In that case, the participating undertaking is liable to be punished for the whole infringement, rather like a person who aids and abets the commission of a criminal act by others (see Joined Cases C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P and C-219/00 P Aalborg Portland and others v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 1:12 pm
Nesse sentido, alega que o legislador dispôs por ato próprio acerca da remuneração, “sem que tal proposta tenha partido da chefia do Executivo estadual”, o que viola ao disposto no artigo 61, parágrafo 1º, inciso II, alíneas ‘a’, ‘b’ e ‘c’; e artigo 63, inciso I, da Constituição Federal. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 5:00 am
§274a.12(b)(20), a person lawfully employed under A-3, E-1,E-2,E-3,G-5,H-1B, H-2A/B, H-3, I, J-1, L-1, O-1/O-2, P-1/P-2/P-3, R or TN status who timely files an application for extension consistent with 8 C.F.R. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:14 am
P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
5 May 2015, 5:58 am
The full text of the Decisions [updated 11:20am] is available online at C-146/13 and C-147/13. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 3:44 pm
People-to-People Travel ➥   In accordance with the NSPM, OFAC is requiring that (1) all people-to-people nonacademic educational travel be conducted under the auspices of an organization that is subject to U.S. jurisdiction and that sponsors such exchanges to promote people-to-people contact, and (2) such travelers be accompanied by a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction who is a representative of the sponsoring organization. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am by Allard Knook
Consequently, even though the sums involved in the measure at issue were not held permanently by the public authorities, the fact that they remained constantly under public control, and therefore available to the competent national authorities, was sufficient for them to be categorised as State resources (see, to that effect, Case C‑83/98 P France v Ladbroke Racing and Commission [2000] ). [read post]