Search for: "CF-3"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,385
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
Cf. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
July 1, 2018Appellate Division, First DepartmentFirst Department Holds Brooke’s Reasoning Applies with Equal Force Where Child Is Legally Adopted by One Partner and Other Partner Claims He or She Is A AParent@With Co‑Equal Rights Because Of Preadoption Agreement. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
July 1, 2018Appellate Division, First DepartmentFirst Department Holds Brooke’s Reasoning Applies with Equal Force Where Child Is Legally Adopted by One Partner and Other Partner Claims He or She Is A AParent@With Co‑Equal Rights Because Of Preadoption Agreement. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
(Cf. 2015 Guidelines’ $1,115 self-support reserve amount.) [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 5:42 am
Sous réserve du respect des dispositions de la Règle 106 CBE, ce qui sera examiné ci-après (cf. point 3.1.1), la requête apparaît recevable.2. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 2:27 pm
(…) L’enregistrement d’une marque entraine « constructive notice », erga omnes, de la revendication de titularité de la marque (cf. 15 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:14 am
G 3/97 and G 4/97), the consequence of which being that the opposition is inadmissible? [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:17 pm
Moreover, A2 also shares many structural features with the invention (cf. point 2.2 above). [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:44 pm
In response, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether he substantially complied with the proof of loss requirement (cf. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:28 am
Since the judgment of divorce was vacated and the plaintiff was [*3]afforded an opportunity to retain new counsel and to conduct further discovery, the plaintiff cannot, under these circumstances, establish that she has sustained damages proximately caused by Hasin’s alleged negligent representation (see Katz v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., 48 AD3d 640, 641; Perks v Lauto & Garabedian, 306 AD2d 261, 262; Albin v Pearson, 289 AD2d 272, 272-273; cf. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 8:34 am
Thus, the period of two months for requesting the continuation of the appeal proceedings ended on 12 December 2017 (cf. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
[FN2] Given the [*3]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:36 pm
J 5/80 of 7 July 1981, OJ EPO 1981, 343, Headnote I).3. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 8:10 pm
That documentation provides the basis for the systematic organization of what is now called China's "New Era" in three senses: (1) for Chinese Marxist Leninism; (2) for China's place in the world; (3) and for the re-establishment of an individual leader a the "core" of that internal and external progress. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 4:12 pm
., No. 5:15-CV-00587, 2015 WL 13545188, at *3 (W.D. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am
[FN2] Given the [*3]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am
In addition, there were other objections raised against the opposed patent so that continuation of the proceedings did not depend entirely on said point-of-law.44 The OD finds that a separate appealable decision under Article 106(2) EPC should be the exception in order to avoid fragmentation of the proceedings and should be given only if the duration or costs of the proceedings are reduced (cf Guidelines E-X… [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am
[*3]To the extent that the plaintiffs’ allegations are insufficiently specific to each legal matter or particularized, the plaintiffs set forth a reasonable basis to believe that, with additional discovery, they would be able to develop sufficient facts to make more specific allegations (see Lemle v Lemle, 92 AD3d 494, 499-500 [2012]). [read post]
22 May 2018, 11:42 am
" (There's also a great cite to 'grand theft avocado' -- P.C. sec. 487(b)(1)(A), cf. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:53 am
In this respect, she shared the majority’s concern not to be seen to be micromanaging Government policy (see Arden LJ at [128]-[131], cf Beatson LJ at [162] and Briggs LJ at [175]). [read post]
