Search for: "CHASE v. THE STATE"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
V. [read post]
18 May 2010, 10:51 pm
Under the United States Supreme Court interpretation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the defendant was clearly not seized as the United States Supreme Court held in a case called California v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:35 am
I love my dog, but I hate dogs who chase me on my bike or who snarl at me on my runs. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 6:07 am
Andrews v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 9:20 am
April 30, 2009), a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit applied the United States Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:38 am
Chase Bank USA, NA, 2008 WL 2783231, at *3 (E.D. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 4:42 pm
By Eric Goldman U.S. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:22 am
In Westervelt v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 7:09 am
See, e.g., Bush v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:08 am
JPMorgan Chase & Co., No. 15-691 (unclear) [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 4:02 pm
Arizona V. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:31 am
State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
During last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:50 pm
The State not only urges us to answer that question in the negative, but it also requests that we wholly abandon the proportionality framework from State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 5:16 pm
March 25, 2009) (available here) United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 5:16 pm
March 25, 2009) (available here) United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* See Matter of DeFazio v DiNapoli, 211 AD3d 1254, and Matter of Frederick v New York State Comptroller, 204 AD3d 1292.** See Matter of Pirrone v Town of Wallkill, 6 AD3d 447, in which the Appellate Division addressed the recommendation of a hearing officer's finding that the individual was required to undergo spinal fusion surgery or forfeit General Municipal Law §207-c disability retirement benefits. [read post]
