Search for: "COLEMAN v. STATE"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,003
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm
: The need to encourage legal entrepreneurship (Spicy IP) State’s copyright not exempt under RTI Act: Delhi Metro Rail Corp. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
: General Motors LLC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:28 am
For instance consider the case of Coleman v Attridge Law which finally settled this year and which extended the old Disability Discrimination Act to cover “associative discrimination”, now enshrined in the Equality Act. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
Coleman v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:14 am
Highlights this week included: US: Prosecutors dismiss Xbox-modding case mid-trial: USA v Crippen (ArsTechnica) (Michael Geist) (1709 Blog) CAFC: Section 101 and process claims: Research Corp. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
Medinol Limited (EPLAW) EWHC (Pat): Costs order knocks spots off pimple patent: Select Healthcare v Cromptons (PatLit) EWPCC: ‘User’ basis available for assessment of trade mark damages: National Guild of Removers & Storers Ltd v Silveria (t/a C S Movers) (IP finance) Do it by the book: case management and questions for reference: Westwood v Knight; SAS Institute v World Programming (IPKat) EWCA finds Grimme’s agricultural machinery patent… [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 5:31 pm
In Coleman v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:35 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:31 pm
In Coleman v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
S. 350 (1993), and vital judicial review to be blocked, see, e. g., Coleman v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
S. 350 (1993), and vital judicial review to be blocked, see, e. g., Coleman v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 2:20 pm
., v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:34 pm
Nahum (IP Law Blog) District Court S D New York: Amazon isn’t liable for rogue affiliate’s keyword ad buys: Sellify v. [read post]
The Rule 54(b) Trap: Dealing with Non-final Orders in Cases with Multiple Claims or Multiple Parties
15 Nov 2010, 12:27 pm
See Coleman v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:33 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm
Coleman v. [read post]