Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2020, 12:57 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 5:07 pm
Supreme Court of Georgia Rules on Juror Questions Issue The Supreme Court of Georgia issued an opinion in Hernandez v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 9:37 am
The California Court of Appeals disagrees. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm
Levitt v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 11:57 am
But you simply do the best you can; the Confrontation Clause does not preclude the jury's reliance upon her testimony.That seems right to me.I also found tangentially interesting an unpublished California Court of Appeal opinion that Judge Fletcher discussed in her opinion. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
Washington, because it was not subject to cross-examination. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:28 pm
Google (Northern District of California). [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 5:18 pm
Preserve Poway v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
However, the New York Court of Appeals—the state’s highest court—muddied the waters in 2010, when it decided Debra H. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 11:06 pm
See Valassis Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 2:08 am
Once an appeals court gets the impression that something went wrong below, reversal becomes much more likely. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm
As already mentioned on 25 March 2021 the Court of Appeal handed down two judgments. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:47 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed a California district court’s preliminary injunction barring the state from enforcing AB5 and its ABC test for IC status against any motor carrier doing business in California. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 5:57 pm
At the Insurers urging, the court adopted the holding from the California Court of Appeals decision in DeBruyn v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 6:00 am
In their cross-appeal, plaintiffs appeal from the trial court's orders directing their counsel to ask them certain questions relating to their association with the Guild. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:29 pm
This same issue is now currently before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in GlaxoSmithKline PLC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:00 am
Furthermore, as noted by the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
The lawyer, according to the court, had crossed the line from a criminal lawyer to a lawyer-criminal; he went to prison for 87 months. [read post]
