Search for: "California v. Arizona"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,004
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 9:28 am
The CRIT was one of five tribes to have its water rights confirmed in the landmark case of Arizona v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 9:05 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Next week (September 24-26) the University of California, Santa Barbara hosts a conference titled "Beyond the New Deal Order. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 1:10 pm
As the California Supreme Court explained in Collection Bureau of San Jose v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:47 pm
Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479 (1984), and Arizona v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
See Arizona v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:17 am
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission could have on California’s independent redistricting regime. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 7:16 am
” And writing at Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf suggests that Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (AIRC). [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
The 5th Circuit previously ruled in Missouri v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
Oracle v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 7:12 am
California Teachers Association continues. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:24 am
California (10-5196) with a statement by four Justices responding to the denial. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Those states were Alaska[1], Arizona[2], Idaho[3], Michigan[4], New York[5], North Dakota[6], and Utah[7]. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
App'x 819, 820-21 (2d Cir. 2010) (applying Arizona law); Gove v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:04 am
The editorial board of the New York Times discusses Douglas v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 11:38 am
Federal Election Commission (2014); Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:47 pm
The two that immediately come to mind for me are Arizona v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm
If a Californian (resident of one of the states that still ban the practice) decides to cross into Arizona to place a bet on his favorite team, California doesn't have the right to punish him for it. [read post]
