Search for: "California v. United States" Results 741 - 760 of 12,632
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2013, 7:17 am by hls
With this decision, accompanied by the defeat of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:26 pm
Johnson (University of California, Davis - School of Law) has posted How Racial Profiling in America Became the 'Law of the Land': United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Michael Mongan, the California Solicitor General, represented the state, while Jeffrey Lamken represented the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). [read post]
21 Dec 2024, 2:33 pm
Seth has represented a broad range of clients in complex business disputes in various state and federal courts, and he has argued numerous matters before California appellate courts, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
To the shock of employers, on May 2, 2019, a unanimous three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals (the Panel), in Vasquez v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:20 am by Kent Scheidegger
  It's pretty straightforward, given the Ninth's prior rejection of an attack on the similar federal statute in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:57 pm by Matthew D. Roy
History of the Case It is reported that the debtor initiated a voluntary Chapter 11 petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California in June 2023. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 2:10 pm
Insurance LawInsurance Agent’s LiabilityJoinderDiversityCalifornia Law  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 2:04 pm by Harold O'Grady
After the recent July 16, 2014 Order Declaring California’s Death Penalty System Unconstitutional by the United States District Court for the Central District Of California in the case of Jones v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:31 am by John Bellinger
  In a short but carefully-structured opinion issued March 2, Judge Stephen Wilson of the Central District of California held that the plaintiffs’ claims do not “touch and concern” the United States with sufficient force to rebut the presumption against extraterritorial application of the ATS set forth in the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel. [read post]